| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Feb | Apr » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
- behind the news (39)
- memories (9)
- staff notes (16)
- 3. September 2010: Wedding Bells
- 8. August 2010: Deep Background
- 1. July 2010: Summer Hours
- 17. June 2010: NNA Board Met Last Week
- 15. June 2010: Back in Town
- 25. May 2010: Our Advertising Guy Moved On
- 9. April 2010: 6 Day Mail
- 28. March 2010: AWH Class of 1964 Salutes Gallagher & Gantley
- 21. March 2010: All Politics Are Local
- 7. March 2010: Town Meeting Shows Deep Division
Blogroll
family
news
Town Meeting Shows Deep Division
It’s been an exhausting week for Town Meeting members and others who have been watching the workings of Milton government.
Five nights of debate ended Thursday, March 4, when a motion to reconsider the Temple zoning article was withdrawn by the man who put reconsideration on the table.
Webster Collins had suggested the meeting reconsider the article so it could be sent back to the Planning Board. One hour later, after a number of town meeting members had spoken either for or against the concept of reconsideration, it was apparent the question was moot.
Temple President Linda Packer told the meeting the Temple has to act by May and town officials drew a time line that made it clear the article could not be discussed again at the annual town meeting.
Now the ball is in the Temple’s court. Some neighbors want to walk to retail shops. Some neighbors want nothing to do with adding a commercial mix to their area. Members of the Temple say their option is to sell the land to someone who would create affordable and high density housing in a way that would sidestep town zoning.
It was a draining process.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.